Pardo: In Cuba, no dissent tolerated

Pardo giving his talk.

At a meeting organised by the Icelandic Pen Club and the Reykjavik Municipal Libary Saturday 10 October the poet and blogger Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo gave a talk on human rights violations in Cuba. Writer Sjon was in the chair. After persecution by Castro’s secret police, Pardo decided to move to the United States. In his lecture, he expressed surprise at the belief that by criticizing oppression in Cuba he had somehow become a U.S. Republican. It was an indisputable fact that the Cuban regime was one of censorship and suppression of all dissent, all divergence. Writers who dared criticize the rulers or even just to discuss matters not supposed to be on the agenda were monitored, threatened, imprisoned, often tortured and sometimes executed. Pardo said that he regarded himself as a leftist, but Westerners should not close their eyes to the oppression on this tropical, distant island.

Pardo showed a slide which compared the arrangements of the Icelandic parliament where the seats of different parties were shown in different colours and of the Cuban National Assembly where all representatives belonged to one party and where hence all the seats were of the same colour. Pardo presented many slides with photographs of persecuted Cuban intellectuals, including Carlos Franqui who had been removed from photographs after he turned against communism. Pardo also showed clips from Castro’s speeches including the notorious one on 13 March 1963 where he attacked tight jeans worn by some Cuban youth as being “feminine”.  In his talk, Pardo described the mass migration out of Cuba. Many Cubans had voted with their feet or with their oars, by fleeing or moving from Cuba. In Pardo’s judgement, Raúl Casto who had replaced his brother Fidel as dictator, had not significantly liberalised the country. It was most likely that Raúl’s son would succeed him, making Cuba a hereditary state like North Korea.

The meeting was well-attended, but little mention was made of the past fervour by which many Icelanders supported the Castro régime. Magnus Kjartansson, editor of Socialist newspaper Thjodviljinn, had travelled to Cuba in 1962, had had discussions with Che Guevara and had listened to some of Castro’s marathon speeches.  The people he met included Carlos Franqui, mentioned in Pardo’s lecture. In Iceland, Kjartansson published a travelogue praising Castro. Some Icelanders, including Silja Adalsteinsdottir, for a while also an editor of Thjodviljinn, and Pall Halldorsson, militant leader of the public employees’ association, had also been volunteers harvesting sugar for Castro. The last action of the People’s Alliance, dissolved in 1998, was to send a delegation to Cuba on the invitation of the Cuban Communist Party. The delegates included Margret Frimannsdottir, last Chairman of the People’s Alliance, and Svavar Gestsson, the East Germany-trained Chairman of the People’s Alliance in 1980–1987. The delegation asked for a meeting — or rather an audience — with Castro who however did not bother to meet them. The support of RNH for this meeting forms a part of the joint project with AECR, Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists, on “Europe of the Victims: Remembering Communism”.

Comments Off

Gissurarson in Sofia: Liberty in Iceland, 930–2015

Sofia city centre.

At a regional meeting of the ESFL, European Students for Liberty in Sofia, Bulgaria, Saturday 17 October, Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson gives a lecture on “Liberty in Iceland, 930–2015”. He takes the position that the laws of economics must be valid everywhere, also in small societies like Iceland, if they are to be considered laws of economics. Economic analysis can for example explain how and why private enforcement of law, as practised in the 930–1262 Icelandic Commonwealth, worked reasonably well. Ancient Icelanders also developed an effective system of utililising mountain pastures, each of them held in common by a rural community, and thus they escaped the “tragedy of the commons”. Professor Gissurarson also discusses the question why for centuries Icelanders starved while living close to fertile fishing grounds, and finds the answer in the alliance of the foreign king and the small class of local landowners who basically outlawed fisheries as an independent profession. This alliance was finally broken in the 1784–5 Mist Famine. Professor Gissurarson analyses the Icelandic system of individual transferable quotas developed in the fisheries. As a result, these fisheries are both sustainable and profitable: Icelanders have yet again escaped the “tragedy of the commons”.

Professor Gissurarson contrasts the 1991–2004 market capitalism in Iceland to the 2004–8 crony capitalism when a small group of powerful oligarchs used the good credit Iceland enjoyed as a result of sound policies pursued in the previous decade for massive accumulation of foreign debt. Professor Gissurarson maintains, however, that the credit expansion was not the real cause of the 2008 Icelandic bank collapse. The real cause was the refusal of the U.S. Fed to provide liquidity to the Icelandic banks, by dollar swap deals, at the same time as it did so to almost all other banks in Europe. At the same time, the U.K. government closed British banks owned by Icelanders while presenting an immense rescue package for all other British banks, and moreover invoked an anti-terrorist law against Icelandic banks and institutions. Professor Gissurarson argues that the reason Iceland has risen so quickly again is that it was never bankrupt, as British Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrongly asserted during the crisis. The Icelandic economy was, and is, soundly built on four pillars, profitable fisheries, ample energy resources, a booming tourist industry and much accumulated human capital. Professor Gissurarson’s lecture forms a part of the joint RNH-AECR project on “Europe, Iceland and the Future of Capitalism”.

Comments Off

Hannesson: For Wise Use Environmentalism

Photo: Kristinn Einarsson.

Environmental protection can be reasonable, whereas demands for it have often been characterised by fanaticism and irresponsibility, Professor Rognvaldur Hannesson argued at a conference held in his honour by RNH and the School of Social Sciences and the Economics Faculty of the University of Iceland Thursday 8 October 2015. In his lecture, Hannesson gave an outline of his recent book, Ecofundamentalism. There, he made a distinction between “wise use” environmentalism and ecofundamentalism where people ascribe special rights to “Nature” against man. Hannesson submitted that ecofundamentalism was religious in nature. He pointed out that almost all the predictions in Limits to Growth—which appeared in an Icelandic translation in 1974—have been wide off the mark; that the so-called precautionary principle is more of a paralysing principle, because it hinders experiments and therefore progress; that it remains unclear whether global warming is undesirable, as it is difficult to demonstrate that the present climate is the best one possible; that oil and coal are cheap sources of energy and simple to utilise; and that the rate of population increase has gone down in the last few decades, while food production per acre has vastly increased.

Professor Rognvaldur Hannesson is an internationally renowned expert on resource economics, the author of around 100 refereed papers and six books. Professor Bengt Kristrom of Umea University in Sweden and Julian Morris, Director of Academic Studies at the Reason Foundation in the United States, responded to Hannesson’s lecture. Dr. Dadi Mar Kristofersson, President of the School of Social Sciences, introduced Hannesson, and Professor Tor Einarsson, Chairman of the Economics Faculty, chaired the meeting which was well-attended. Whereas Hannesson has spent his professional career abroad, mostly at the Norwegian School of Business in Bergen, some of his old schoolmates from Iceland turned up for his lecture. On the day of the conference, Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson published in the leading Icelandic daily Morgunbladid an article on Hannesson’s book, describing some of the main arguments in Hannesson’s book. According to him, Hannesson’s message was similar to that of Bjorn Lomborg, whose book on the Sceptical Environmentalist was published in Icelandic in 2000, and of Matt Ridley, whose book on the Rational Optimist was published in Icelandic in 2014. In the evening, Education and Culture Minister Illugi Gunnarsson gave a dinner in Hannesson’s honour. The RNH participation in this event forms a part of the joint project with AECR, the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists, on “Europe, Iceland and the Future of Capitalism”.

Comments Off

Oppression in Cuba

Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo

Cuban writer Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo gives a talk at a meeting of the Pen Club in Iceland Saturday 10 October 2015 at 14 in the City Library in Grofin, Reykjavik Centre. The meeting is co-sponsored by the City Library. Pardo describes the systemic abuse of human rights in Cuba and the reasons he was forced to leave the country. Pardo was born in Havana 1971 and received a degree in biochemistry from the University of Havana. Around 2000, he became a photographer and writer, starting the online magazine Voces in 2010, the only such magazine in Cuba. The material from Voces often had to be clandestinely distributed on CDs or in photocopies, as the authorities try to limit access to the Internet. In 2009, Cuban secret service agents sought out Pardo and a colleague of his and gave them a beating. In September 2012, Pardo was arrested, but when the news of the arrest spred, a multitude gathered outside the prison where he was held, to protest. He was released later the same day. He later moved to the United States where he has edited and contributed to a collection of short stories, Cuba in Splinters. He also writes poems and blogs.

In the beginning of 1959, communists seized power in Cuba and have ruled the fertile, sunny, tropical island since then with an iron fist, long under the leadership of Fidel Castro. Their oppressive regime is described in the Black Book of Communism, published in Icelandic in 2009. Almost 30,000 people are thought to have perished as a result of their activities (compared to around 3,000 in Pinochet’s Chile). More than 100,000 people have had to spend time in prisons and labour camps. In addition to a powerful secret police, the Cuban communists organised special neighbourhood committees to watch over people and to discover any dissent. Individual enterprise is held down as much as possible. It is estimated that around two million people have fled the country: they have “voted with their oars”. Icelandic leftists have however been staunch supporters of the Cuban communist regime. Magnus Kjartansson, editor of their now-defunct organ The Nation’s Will (Thjodviljinn), went to Cuba in 1962, spent an evening with Che Guevara and listened to two of Castro’s long speeches, and subsequently wrote a pro-Castro book, The Cuban Revolution (Byltingin a Kubu). Many Icelandic leftists also worked as volunteers on Castro’s sugar plantations, including literary critic Silja Adalsteinsdottir, also for a while editor of The Nation’s Will, and labour leader Pall Halldorsson. The last action of the main leftist party, the People’s Alliance, before it was dissolved in 1998 was to send a delegation to the Cuban Communist Party, led by two former Party Chairmen, Margret Frimannsdottir and Svavar Gestsson. They asked for an interview, or rather an audience, with Fidel Castro, who did not bother to receive them.

Cuban refugees vote with their oars. From the Black Book of Communism.

Comments Off

Conference in Honour of Hannesson

The School of Social Sciences and the Economics Faculty at the University of Iceland, and RNH, hold a conference on “Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Utilisation” Thursday 8 October 2015 at 16.30–18 at the Festivities Hall of the University. The conference is in honour of one of Iceland’s most distinguished scholars, Rognvaldur Hannesson, Professor Emeritus in Resource Economics at the Norwegian School of Commerce in Bergen, the author of around 100 academic papers and six books. The conference focuses on Hannesson’s latest book, Ecofundamentalism, where the author makes a distinction between wise use environmentalism, which he favours, and ecofundamentalism, which he criticizes. Professor Dadi Mar Kristofersson, President of the School of Social Sciences, introduces the guest of honour. Professor Hannesson delivers a keynote lecture. Two discussants comment on the subject, Bengt Kristrom, Professor of Resource Economics at Umea University in Sweden, and Julian Morris, Director of Academic Studies at Reason Foundation in the United States. After questions and answers, Professor Hannesson gives final remarks. A reception on the premises follows. Admission is free and all are welcome.

Comments Off

Well-attended and successful ESFL conference

Ragnar Árnason flytur fyrirlestur sinn.

The regional meeting of the European Students for Liberty, ESFL, which took place in Reykjavik Saturday 3 October 2015 was well-attended and very successful. Attendees included not only university students, but also many from senior high schools or grammar schools in the Reykjavik region. RNH supported the conference in various ways. The Chairman of RNH’s Academic Council, Professor Ragnar Arnason, spoke on free markets and property rights. RNH’s Director of Academic Studies, Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson, held a reception at his home for the foreign guests. Gisli Hauksson, RNH’s Chairman of the Board, organised a reception hosted by Gamma, a rapidly growing fund management company. The participation of RNH in the conference forms a part of the joint project with AECR, Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists, on “Europe, Iceland and the Future of Capitalism”. Other speakers at the conference were business affairs reporter Asgeir Ingvarsson who spoke on the impact of immigration on income distribution, Icelandic MP Sigridur Andersen who discussed the relationship between politics and ideals, Roderick T. Long, Philosophy Professor at Auburn University, who described “left-wing liberalism” or the alliance of libertarians and radical leftists, both of whom are sceptical of government and hierarchies, and investor Heidar Gudjonsson, who analysed public debt in Western democracies and traced its accumulation, unsustainable in some countries, to the government monopoly of producing money. While the attendees at the conference disagreed on many issues, they generally welcomed the fresh and innovative ideas put forward there. The conference was moderated by Lukas Schweiger, originally from Austria, but residing at present in Iceland, and Eyd Aradottir from the Faroe Islands, now residing in Denmark. The conference was taped by the Sons of Libertas, and parts of it, as well as interviews with some speakers, will be included in a documentary produced by the SoL.

Slides of Ragnar Arnason

Comments Off